If a minor planet on a close approach to the Earth is viewed from
places that are widely separated, it will not appear in quite the same
position against the background stars from the two different sites (Figure
1)
Figure 1
This is due to parallax
and is the same effect used to directly measure the distances
to the nearest stars, but in that case, rather than use different observatories imaging
at the same time, the Earth is allowed to move half way around its orbit,
so that the baseline for the parallax measurement is as long as possible,
i.e. the diameter of the Earth's orbit.
For NEO distance determination, the two observatories should be widely
separated, the further apart the larger the measurable parallax effect
will be but also, the fewer objects will be visible at the same time from
both places. With two observatories literally half way around the Earth
from each other, although the baseline would be as long as possible (the
diameter of the Earth) the two sites would only be able to simultaneously observe objects
that were visible at sunset from one site and also visible at sunrise from
the other, drastically limiting the opportunities.
In November 2004 Monty Robson, the Director of the
John J. McCarthy Observatory (IAU code 932) in Connecticut, USA made
contact with the Great Shefford Observatory (J95) to suggest some simultaneous
observing of NEOs, to directly determine their distance. The John
J. McCarthy Observatory is sited in the grounds of the New Milford High
School and is used for educational and research purposes.
The John J. McCarthy Observatory has a good track record of NEO range finding,
the technique had been used to great effect by New Milford student Lisa Glukhovsky
in 2003 with
a project originally suggested by Monty Robson "A Rapid, Accurate Method of Determining the Distance to Near
Earth Asteroids" which has won her
many awards, including top prize at the 2003 Intel International Science
and Engineering Fair.
Student's asteroid project wins INTEL award
Simultaneous Imaging
After waiting for clear sky on both sides of the Atlantic, the
collaboration between 932 and J95 kicked off on 26 November 2004 with
simultaneous imaging of NEO 2004 VB, discovered at the start of that month
by the LONEOS survey at Lowell Observatory. On 26th November this Apollo asteroid was
at a distance of about 5.5m miles (8.8m Km) and closing, at magnitude +17
and moving at about 14"/min.
Field of view 6' x 4', North up
Parallax effect shifts the apparent position of 2004 VB by 1'57" in p.a. 65°/245°
between the two observatories. |
Details:
John J. McCarthy Observatory (932):
Long. 73.4°W, 41.5°N, height above sea level 79m
0.4-m Schmidt-Cassegrain at f/6.6
Focal length 2690mm
SBig ST-10XME CCD binned 3x3, 1.56"/pixel
Five exposures of 10 seconds each.
|
Great Shefford Observatory
(J95):
Long. 1.4°W, 51.5°N, height above sea level 100m
0.3-m Schmidt-Cassegrain at f/6.0
Focal length 1821mm
Apogee AP47p CCD binned 2x2, 3.01"/pixel
Image enlarged by x1.93
Five exposures of 14 seconds each. |
Using the astrometry obtained simultaneously from the two stations and
plugging the numbers into a spreadsheet developed by Dr Jeff Tarvin for
the John J. McCarthy Observatory, the distance of 2004 VB was determined,
with key results summarised in Table 1:
Table 1 (Results of direct distance determination for NEO 2004 VB on 26
Nov 2004)
Baseline distance (between observatories) |
5,245.5 Km |
|
Parallax angle |
116.9" |
|
Calculated distance to 2004 VB |
8,771,756 Km |
= 22.84 LD
(Lunar Distances) |
Actual distance to 2004 VB (from JPL ephemeris) |
8,793,741 Km |
= 22.90 LD |
Error in calculated distance |
21,985 Km |
= -0.25% |
In order to get simultaneous imaging from both sites it was found to
help greatly by using an internet instant messaging application. Microsoft
MSN Messenger was used but any of the commonly used IM applications would
have done just as well, including Yahoo messenger, AOL Messenger etc.
Agreeing exposure policy beforehand is also a 'must' to obtain
simultaneous imaging. We agreed to set exposure duration to whatever was
optimal for our individual systems (in this case 10 seconds for 932 and 14
seconds for J95) but to centre the exposures at the start of each minute.
932 would therefore start the 10 second exposures at 55seconds past the
minute, whereas at J95 the 14 second exposures would start at 53 seconds
past the minute. One image would be obtained each minute until enough
images had been obtained from both sides to allow good astrometry to be
measured by using Astrometrica to track & stack individual images
together.
Other benefits of (near) simultaneous imaging
In a second collaboration between 932 and J95 a newly discovered object
on the NEO confirmation page was imaged from both observatories early on
3rd Dec 2004. The
object was posted on the NEOCP as AR66046 on 2004 Dec 02 at 23:02 UT and listed as mag
+17.7, moving at 14"/minute and with an uncertainty area of about
1°x0.5°.
A search was undertaken for the unconfirmed object from both observatories, with areas being
divided up between the two observatories to speed the coverage of the entire uncertainty area. It was
picked up first from J95 and subsequently a simultaneous imaging run was
completed by both observatories, the results appearing on MPEC
2004-X06 with details of the newly designated Aten class NEO 2004
XJ showing three pairs of observations from 932 and J95 with exactly
matching times!
Using these measurements, as an example of how having astrometry from two widely separated places
tightens up the orbit determination from a very short arc, two orbits were
calculated (using the excellent freeware program FindOrb
from Bill Gray).
Orbit 1 was determined using the positions
of 2004 XJ from J95 only. The
residuals for the 932 positions were calculated from this orbit although these
positions were not
used in the orbit computation (Table 2).
Orbit 2 was then calculated using the positions from J95 as
well as those from 932 and the residuals again calculated (Table 3).
As can be seen, although a very reasonable fit to the J95 positions is
found with the first orbit, the distance to the object is not well
determined and the residuals for the 932 positions are huge.
Adding in the
932 positions in the second orbit brings the residuals for all positions
to very acceptable levels and the distance to the NEO is determined using
positions over a time span of just 1h 45m to be just 0.2% different to that
determined by JPL using all positions reported during the entire observed
13 day apparition (Table 4).
Table 2 (Orbit 1 using only using J95 positions):
Date |
RA residual |
Dec. Residual |
Observatory |
2004 12 02.98280 |
-0.46 |
0.29 |
J95 |
2004 12 02.98643 |
0.33 |
-0.28 |
J95 |
2004 12 02.98982 |
0.12 |
0.04 |
J95 |
2004 12 03.01840 |
0.41 |
-0.40 |
J95 |
2004 12 03.03611 |
-20.14 |
-5.98 |
932 |
2004 12 03.03611 |
-0.43 |
0.23 |
J95 |
2004 12 03.03993 |
-20.17 |
-6.56 |
932 |
2004 12 03.03993 |
-0.17 |
0.31 |
J95 |
2004 12 03.05035 |
-0.17 |
0.25 |
J95 |
2004 12 03.05590 |
-19.77 |
-7.69 |
932 |
2004 12 03.05590 |
0.37 |
-0.43 |
J95 |
Table 3 (Orbit 2 using positions from both J95 and 932):
Date |
RA residual |
Dec. Residual |
Observatory |
2004 12 02.98280 |
-0.40 |
0.30 |
J95 |
2004 12 02.98643 |
0.35 |
-0.29 |
J95 |
2004 12 02.98982 |
0.10 |
0.03 |
J95 |
2004 12 03.01840 |
0.23 |
-0.42 |
J95 |
2004 12 03.03611 |
0.20 |
0.14 |
932 |
2004 12 03.03611 |
-0.53 |
0.25 |
J95 |
2004 12 03.03993 |
0.03 |
-0.18 |
932 |
2004 12 03.03993 |
-0.24 |
0.34 |
J95 |
2004 12 03.05035 |
-0.10 |
0.34 |
J95 |
2004 12 03.05590 |
-0.18 |
-0.19 |
932 |
2004 12 03.05590 |
0.54 |
-0.31 |
J95 |
The distance from Earth as determined for the J95 position for Dec
03.03611 UT is shown below in Table 4:
Table 4 (Distance from Earth at 00:52 UT 03 Dec 2004)
Source |
#
Positions |
Timespan |
Distance from Earth
(A.U.) |
% error
(c.f. JPL orbit) |
Orbit 1
(Only J95 positions) |
8 |
1h 45m |
0.0410 |
-13.0% |
Orbit 2
(J95 & 932 positions) |
11 |
1h 45m |
0.0472 |
+0.2% |
JPL
(All reported positions
from all observatories) |
75 |
13 days |
0.0471 |
0% |
This technique of simultaneous or near simultaneous imaging of nearby
objects is a powerful one and can help in the initial determination of NEO
orbits. As has been shown at the John J. McCarthy Observatory it is also a
very useful educational tool. If you are interested in participating
please contact Monty Robson by e-mail
mail @
mccarthyobservatory.org (remove the blanks before mailing) or
visit their web site at John
J. McCarthy Observatory.
Check out the presentation delivered by Monty
Robson and Peter Birtwhistle at the MACE 2006 meeting in Vienna:
Direct
determination of NEO distance by parallax, containing some of the
material on this page. The original Powerpoint presentation has been
converted to images, including animations and the dialogue used during the presentation
added as text.
Great Shefford Observatory would like to thank Monty Robson for the
initial invitation to collaborate on this project and his continuing great
enthusiasm, without which none of the NEO distance determination described
above would have happened. Further distance determinations are planned to
be made between 932 and J95 when conditions are favourable.
All images from John J. McCarthy Observatory are used with permission.
If you wish to use any of those images then please include an
acknowledgement to the John J. McCarthy Observatory.
Footnote:
On 6th March 2005 we
were very pleased to welcome Dr Jeff Tarvin, (author of the spreadsheet
used in the range finding exercise) for a short
visit to Great Shefford Observatory. Pictured below
is Jeff (left) and Peter Birtwhistle in front of the observatory, both
sporting John J McCarthy Observatory t-shirts!
|